If you have forgotten your password, enter your email address below, and we will send you an email with further instructions on how to reset it.
* – denotes required field
The Universities’ HR Benchmarking Program was initiated by QUT and commenced in early 2004. QUT’s main objective in the provision of this service to universities was to establish a highly relevant, low cost and flexible HR benchmarking program with a high level of university participation.
Participating universities in the program are committed to working together to better manage human resources in the higher education sector.
Benchmarking essentially involves learning, sharing information and adopting best practices to bring about changes in performance. To simplify this, it can be stated as: ‘Improving ourselves by learning from others’
In practice, benchmarking usually encompasses:
Alan Flower (1997) lists 5 main stages in effective benchmarking:
Organisations usually benchmark performance indicators (eg profit margins, return on investment (ROI), cycle times, percentage defects, sales per employee, cost per unit) or business processes (eg how it develops a product or service, how it meets customer orders or responds to enquiries, how it produces a product or service). For human resources, three types of benchmarks are particularly appropriate (Matters, 1993).
Flower, Alan. 1997. How to: benchmarking? Personnel Management 12 June
Matters, M. 1993. Benchmarking HR: The nuts and bolds of benchmarking . Melbourne : Alpha Publications.
Participants receive an easy to read yet comprehensive report with results for a variety of HR performance measures. The report clearly outlines each measure’s definition and purpose and provides tips for interpretation. Results are presented in both tabular and graphical format.
The university-sector workforce is unique. The intricacies of attracting and managing an academic workforce have many implications for the university HR department. Comparing your workforce to that of a large public department or private firm gives you an idea of how you are performing, but these organisations’ workforces do not face the same challenges as a university.
‘The key benefit of the university sector benchmarking program is that it provides the perfect basis for strategic discussions between university HR departments’
In a nutshell, Human Resource Benchmarking enables you to:
Australian Catholic University
Australian National University
Charles Darwin University
Charles Sturt University
Edith Cowan University
James Cook University
La Trobe University
Queensland University of Technology
Southern Cross University
Swinburne University of Technology
University of Adelaide
University of Canberra
University of Newcastle
University of New England
University of New South Wales
University of Notre Dame
University of South Australia
University of Southern Queensland
University of Sydney
University of the Sunshine Coast
University of Tasmania
University of Technology Sydney
University of Western Australia
University of Wollongong
The Universities’ HR Benchmarking Program examines 9 main measures that relate to the Higher Education Sector.
3. Recruitment (Efficiency and Effectiveness)
6. Occupational Health and Safety (OHS)
7. Employment Costs
8. Length of Service (LOS)
The measures on the Universities’ HR Benchmarking program are reviewed annually and revised based on participants’ interest levels.
QUT received DEEWR funding in November 2007 under the Workplace Productivity Programme (WPP) to form a project in conjunction with Talent2 and Bond University that was charged with the development and delivery of national HR practice standards. This project has now been successfully completed.
The objective of this project was to develop a consistent set of National Advisory Standards for the Professional Practice of Human Resources (HR) in Australian universities. The Standards will also be used for international comparative benchmarking purposes. Standards set the basis for quality assessment, performance examination and for demonstrating to stakeholders that value for money is being achieved.
At the time that these standards were developed, there were no national standards for the professional practice of human resource activities in Australian universities. Thus each university independently established the standards that it ‘expected to see’. The Universities HR Benchmarking Group identified a number of HR measures and metrics relevant to the university sector and these were used to inform the research base in establishing standards. For example, the ratio of academic to non academic staff had a wide range of results across the sector but benchmarking could identify the mean, median and shape of the results. From this we estimated “what we would expect to see” and, importantly, variances could be justified on the basis of institutional diversity.
Similarly, the standards established “what we expect to see” in relation to individual universities by reference to the national advisory standards but also treat each university separately by understanding the reasons for adopting different standards. To have each university independently establish human resource standards would be manifestly inefficient (priority differences, time frame differences, format differences and common language would present obvious issues).
The intent of this project was to develop a consistent set of standards to address these issues.
The five In Scope areas that were identified for progressing with the development of the HR Standards were:
These Standards were finalised in January 2011 and endorsed by the Project Sponsor in March 2011.
The five Standards were developed by subject matter experts from the participating Australian Universities.
The QUT/Talent2 Workplace Productivity Programme (WPP) project on ‘HR Standards in Australian Universities’ built a collection of HR Standards for five university HR activity areas.
One element missing from the initial analysis of HR activities was the overall framework within which university human resources operate. It was recognised that this is not an easy task but it potentially establishes the context in which university HR operates.
There is a growing recognition of the need for a HR framework. There are models available from other sources, including overseas.
The HR Framework, developed in conjunction with several Australian Universities and reliant on a selective literature review, sets out a potential format and content for a HR framework for the Australian Higher Education sector.
The final piece of the project was to align the Universities HR Benchmarking Program measures to the HR Advisory Standards, identifying whether the measures are (measures of) Inputs, Processes, Outputs or Outcomes, and whether they are measures of economy, efficiency or effectiveness.
The HR Benchmarking program undertakes data collection on an annual basis commencing 1 March through to 31 March.
Member universities can input their data via the Online Portal which is available here.
HR Benchmarking and Events Manager
03 8611 0515